|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
15
   |
Posted - 2015.02.28 14:21:50 -
[1] - Quote
Hi,
I use fighter assist, I'm pretty sure some people who answered to this post don't use it, they are just the victim. I saw some people use assist fighter without having their carrier or mothership on the grid. We shot the fighters but the owner just call them back. The problem isn't that people are using the assist of their fighter, the problem is fighter CAN'T be destroyed, they should be pointable, we consider them as pilot and not drones. So don't remove them the ability to warp, don't remove the assist. If you remove the assist, there won't be any capitals anymore or just archons and may be chimera. Why would I use a mothership if I use it once every year? Carriers were used to bring ships in 0.0, they can't jump as far as they could, and you can't just every second with the jump fatigue. Now you want to remove the ability to assign fighters? I'll sell my carrier if this is going to happen, and won't skill for more. |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
17
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 09:02:21 -
[2] - Quote
There is something wrong,the way you think CCP, so people can use hyperdunking to suicid gank in high sec? But in 0.0 or low sec they can't use fighter assist? Moreover the fighter won't be able to warp? Stop killing capitals, these ships are one of the most important reason why people want to leave the 0.0. You want to fix something? Make the Rorqual useful, the way he is now it is not. Moreover talking about risk vs reward, the ******* idiot reason you talk about nerfing carrier and mothership. Is it really risky to put a rorqual or an orca in pos to boost his fleet? You know it's not risky but just because people started to cry because it's not risky to assign fighters for a carrier you want to change. Fighter assignement is good as it is, you want to make it more fair to fight, fine, put a big range between POS/ station and carrier/mothership, put a timer, make fighter pointable (and make a killmail because they are pilots after all), I don't know, there are a lot of good ideas in this post if you put it for a carrier don't forget the rorqual/orca in pos which is still cosy inside the pos. |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
17
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 09:03:33 -
[3] - Quote
Sorry for double posting |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
21
|
Posted - 2015.03.01 23:13:39 -
[4] - Quote
Ice-King wrote:
Assigning Fighters:
Only allow fighters to be assigned to ships that are on grid with the carrier. If they leave the grid then control will be returned to the carrier.
This is ASSIST not ASSIGNING, can we talk about the issue with people who know what they are talking about? |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
27
|
Posted - 2015.03.02 09:51:29 -
[5] - Quote
Kane Carnifex, you said it bro, nothing more to say :)
Goin Off, people in my alliance don't really move their carrier to make their logistique, I personnaly don't move my carrier to bring some ships from high-sec but yeah old player and new player won't skill for capitals as they are becoming useless and CCP don't like capitals but we players like these ships and skill these ships for a long time. So please CCP don't remove capitals, make them more usefull, may be make them more expensive to product. |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
32
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 18:47:12 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hello
Appreciate all the feedback very much.
Based on what you've said here we are planning to leave Fighter warping in, but stick with removing assist.
We hear the concerns about the state of capitals and loss of return on investment from training towards them and we absolutely want to make sure that caps of all kinds are not only viable but exciting and powerful. We still feel this change is necessary, but we are looking into ways to improve on the state of capitals and capital balance. No news on that front for now but it's something we are committed to improving.
Thanks again.
Please don't stop taking us for idiots, you make all capitals useless and you say you'll make them usefull one day maybe in a month, a year, may be more than 5 years. Why don't you make them more usefull now? When will you make them usefull? |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
37
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:20:25 -
[7] - Quote
I understood the reason they didn't listen to us (the people who don't want the assignement remove), they don't want us to use the assignement for the next step for the 0.0 sov. It would be too easy to defend the sov with fighter assignement. |
Dean Dewitt
Babylon Knights
DARKNESS.
37
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:41:39 -
[8] - Quote
Yeah but it's in the same package, small and big ships, in the next sov patch, it would be so easy to add fighters dps to any ships. So if people want to use the fighter dps, they will have to put their carrier/mothership on the field, it would have been easy to defend with the assignement.
Maybe they didn't think about it either, but they have to make capitals more useful. |
|
|
| |
|